(This, and I’ve trained on these and knew the name, but not how to spell it. This has been bothering me for awhile, and I finally took the time to track it down. Posted in Hackaday Columns, Linux Hacks, Slider Tagged fuse, linux, Linux Fu, windows Post navigation The example has just four simple functions. Or try a C++ wrapper that enables you to write one with even fewer lines of code. You provide functions that the data structure points to that read and write things like directories and file data. ![]() There’s a data structure to fill in, and you don’t have to fill all of it in. If you don’t use Windows, and you want to write your own FUSE system, these systems offer you a way to possibly easily move your work to Windows.įor example, you might have a data logger and want to expose its data as a file system. If you have a favorite FUSE system, it is probably open source and you could try porting it to Windows, if you were so inclined. According to the Winfsp-provided benchmarks, though, Winfsp performs better. This is a newer project, but there is also Dokan which also claims to have a FUSE wrapper for their API. In fact, there are two FUSE wrappers, one for version 2.8 and another for version 3.2. There is a FUSE compatibility wrapper that lets you more easily port existing FUSE code. Winfsp looks like a great way to get the same effect under Windows, although it isn’t just plug-and-play compatible with FUSE. If this is such a great idea, is there a Windows equivalent? Yes, there is. You can find systems to work with, for example, NTFS and a slew of cloud service providers. tagassistant – Store files with a unique tag access method.rclone – Rclone can access and mount many remote file systems.sshfs – Mount a remote filesystem using nothing more than ssh access.There are several FUSE filesystems that are really useful. This is a single file system module that allows you to create new file systems by writing ordinary code. ![]() Then came FUSE - file system in user space. That’s not as hard as it sounds, but it is a little more difficult than writing a normal program. The downside is that building a filesystem required changing the kernel or, at least, writing a loadable module. ![]() Besides that, there are fake file systems like /sys and /dev that help Linux make everything look like a file. That’s good, too, because a typical system might want a choice of filesystems like ext4, reiserfs, btrfs, and even network systems like nfs. One of the nice things about the Unix philosophy that Linux inherited is that the filesystem is very modular.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |